Pandemic-era Persuasion: How COVID-19 Is Shifting Juror Sentiment

How will COVID-19 influence the way juries perceive medical malpractice defendants? Simply put, it’s complicated.

According to new research about juror beliefs and attitudes related to the pandemic, it’s a mistake to lean too heavily on the “halo effect”—a boost in general goodwill toward medical professionals during COVID-19—as a legal defense strategy. 

Telehealth Post-pandemic: The Genie Will Go Back in the Bottle, Unless…

The following is an excerpt of an article originally published May 8, 2020. You can access the full article at https://bit.ly/36fih62


Many predict that one lasting impact of the COVID-19 pandemic will be expanded use of telehealth. As more patients and providers come to appreciate the convenience of virtual home visits, the traditional office visit will become the exception, not the rule. Right?

Adapting and Advancing: How COVID-19 Is Affecting Medical Malpractice Litigation

The world of legal process, including medical malpractice litigation, is not known for being particularly swift. Yet in the wake of COVID-19, medical malpractice professionals say the industry’s reaction has been remarkably quick and thorough. Here, four experts in medical malpractice discuss how COVID-19 is shifting, shaping, and yes—even advancing the field.

HAS COVID-19 AFFECTED MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CASES DIFFERENTLY THAN OTHER TYPES OF LITIGATION?

Telehealth Informed Consent Tips for Providers

Is written informed consent necessary?

Since state requirements vary, it is important to know the regulatory requirements for your state(s) of practice, as well as for the state of residency for your patient. It is standard practice to obtain written patient consent for medical care. For telehealth, informed consent should include patient education about telehealth and how it differs from an in-person visit.

Subscribe to